EARNINGS · 4 MIN READ

When I mention the figure, the replies split two ways and both are wrong. One says $145 in seven months proves blogging is finished. The other says it is the beginning of a curve that ends somewhere impressive. The number supports neither.

Here is what it does settle. Before June I did not know whether any of this worked. I had read that it worked. I had not seen it.

How long it took, in dates

The site went live on 4 February. The first commission arrived on 19 June — 135 days later. I crossed $100 on 12 August, fifty-four days after that, and reached $145 by 13 September.

So: about four and a half months from publishing to the first dollar, and a little over six months to $100. If you are searching whether $100 is achievable, that is one real answer with dates attached. It is not the answer — one site is a sample of one, and mine is in a competitive consumer category with mid-sized commissions. But it is a floor you can check rather than a projection you have to trust.

The advice you will find elsewhere clusters around two poles: that this is finished, or that people make five figures in year one. Neither describes what happened here.

How that compares to the average

The figure that gets quoted for blogs this age comes from the Blogging Income Survey, reported by Wix: blogs under a year old average $4.44 a month.

This site is eight months old and has earned $145, which is about $18 a month averaged across its whole life — including the four and a half months that earned nothing. Roughly four times that average.

Both readings of that are fair. $145 is a small number, and it is several times what a blog this age typically makes. The average is dragged down by everyone who published three posts and stopped, which is most people who start. Beating it is not an achievement; it mostly means continuing.

What the average cannot tell you is the shape. A $4.44 monthly average implies a trickle. What actually happened was nothing for 135 days and then most of it in eight weeks, which is a different thing to plan around.

What I did not know before June

Whether a new site with no audience could get found at all. Whether people who found it would trust a recommendation from a stranger enough to click it. Whether any of them would actually buy. And whether, if they did, the money would turn up.

Those are four separate questions, and a failure at any one of them produces the same result: nothing. That is the cruel part. Zero earnings looks identical whether your problem is traffic, trust, the product, or the affiliate program — so people conclude the whole model is dead when one piece of it is missing.

On 19 June a $30 commission appeared. It answered all four at once. That is the day the site stopped being a theory.

The difference between $0 and $30 is larger than the difference between $30 and $3,000. One is a question being answered. The other is arithmetic.

What it does not prove

That it keeps going, that it pays a living, or that it transfers to your niche. One post is responsible for most of the clicks here, so an algorithm update could put the site back to zero next month. Anyone reading a third-year income off a first-year number is guessing.

Why the number is low

Not because the site is young. Because I did not know things that I know now, and each of them cost me months.

I applied to twelve affiliate programs early on and only four have ever produced a conversion. The time went into adding links for the eight that do nothing. I let one post become responsible for most of the clicks, which is fragile and also means I learned almost nothing about what else could work. And I did not look at conversion rates per partner until September, when the analysis took twenty minutes and could have been done in March — one partner pays out at under a third the rate of another, and I had been sending it traffic for half a year.

None of that is a hard problem. It is all information I could have had on day one if anyone had written it down plainly, which is the reason I am writing it down plainly.

The other thing worth copying

The timing. I published for four and a half months with nothing to show for it, and if I had judged the site at the end of May I would have been wrong by three weeks. Most people who quit, quit inside that window.

Every date and dollar is in the income report.

Income reports every quarter, plus the guides in between. One email, no sequences.

Subscribe free